Urban Symbiosis as a Strategy for Sustainabilising Cities: An Overview of Options and their Potential, Pitfalls and Solutions- Juniper Publishers
Juniper Publishers- Journal of Civil Engineering
Introduction
A century ago, about 1 in every 7 people lived in
urban areas. Meanwhile, the ratio became 1 to 1 and the proportion of
urban dwellers in the world is still raising sharply UN Department of
Economic and Social Affairs Population Division [1].
Cities grow not only in population; they are also strengthening their
function as nodes in the metabolism of our society. 80% of the energy
consumption takes place in urban areas [2]. In other words, urban areas are growing and have an over-proportional, and growing ecological footprint [3].
The rapid economic and population growth not only
cause climate change; also several resources are becoming scarcer. The
long supply lines of energy and raw materials make cities vulnerable for
international conflicts and natural disasters that interrupt supplies. A
transition in the urban metabolic processes is necessary to prevent
urban catastrophes, create urban resilience, and contribute to global
sustainable development. In this paper, urban symbiosis is presented as a
strategy for optimizing the urban metabolic system. It uses the
proximity of various infrastructures for symbiotic effects, thereby
reducing resource consumption and emissions. The paper briefly sketches
urban systems and their impacts in terms of climate change and resource
depletion. Afterwards it analyses urban symbiosis by describing various
examples, their costs and benefits, and barriers for implementation.
Finally it reflects upon new vulnerabilities and lock inns that might
result from urban symbiosis.
Urban Symbiosis
Cities have the potential to provide various services
for their citizens far more efficiently than rural areas can: The
geographic proximity of activities creates various options for symbiosis
between these activities as distances for transport, often a major cost
factor, are relatively small. Moreover, as cities are still growing,
while the population of many rural areas is in decline, cities are still
constructing new urban areas [4].
This provides an opportunity for constructing new, more efficient
infrastructures that utilize the symbiotic options that have been
developed in recent decades.
Virtually all modern cities have sewage systems,
drinking water systems, traffic systems, energy systems, public
transport systems, waste collection systems. These systems are generally
not the result of the implementation of a single blue print; they have
in part been planned, been adapted, expansions have been planned,
elements have been modernized, systems have merged and elements have
been replaced or merged. Parts of these systems might have grown
organically during the history of a city Cf. e.g. [5].
Urban systems generally emerged as independent
entities, often established by profit driven entrepreneurs. For example,
before the 20th century, drinking water supply generally emerged as a
private business (Cf. e.g. 17th century London [6] and 18th and 1 century Amsterdam [7], just like electricity supply [8] and telecommunications [9,10].
As private and public interests intermingled strongly, and monopoly
power could be abused, these systems were often brought under some form
of public control or statutory frame works. In recent decades, some of
these systems have been (partially) (re-)privatized for an overview [11].
Urban systems are of crucial importance for a well-
functioning city life. Malfunctioning or break downs can be
catastrophic, as for example the New York black out of 1973 [12] causing riots and massive looting, various sewer and drinking water damages due to natural catastrophes [13], a fire in a main telecommunications cable in Tokyo, 1984 laming economic life in a vital urban area for almost two months [14]. The software defect that caused a 9 hour national phone outage in the USA in 1990 [15]
is in fact not a failure of an urban infrastructure, just like the
succumbing of the New Orleans levees during hurricane Katrina
(devastating 300.000 homes and the urban infrastructures of New Orleans
that prevented the population from returning) [16].
The severe impacts of interruptions of service of infra systems make
these services vulnerable for social conflicts: strikes in public
transport [17], or garbage collection [18] can be effective means to fight labor disputes.
Most urban systems are quite robust, and often they
function unaltered for decades. An extreme example might be the street
plan of some cities that can be traced back thousands of years. Systems
can survive unaltered, but are often quite vulnerable for damage if
errors occur. The city archive of Cologne collapsed on March 3rd 2009,
probably due to the construction of a new underground line [19].
The novelty of the construction method of that underground line was
specifically blamed. This created question marks and additional
requirements regarding the construction method for Amsterdam's new
underground line, which had already been contracted [20].
This pattern is rather common in infra systems development: novelty
appears to create risks for the responsible decision makers: accidents/
malfunctioning might be blamed to them. Applying established methods
might not cause less risk for the public, but it causes less political
risks for decision makers; blame avoidance, a well- known political
phenomenon [21]. Blame avoidance implies avoiding innovation in urban infrastructure.
Urban Ambitions: Climate Neutrality and a Circular Economies
Cities increasingly take responsibility for the grand
challenges that humanity faces. Many cities have adopted policy
declarations aiming at climate neutrality [22,23]. Especially in China, many cities are aiming at a circular economy, i.e. much more efficient metabolic systems [24]. Often national statutory action is surpassed by city initiatives.
It is a complex procedure to establish the emissions
of cities. In fact, cities and their surrounding rural areas coexist by a
division of tasks that cannot simply be assigned to rural area or city.
This has resulted in a complex framework for calculating greenhouse gas
emissions [25].
Urban symbiosis is an innovation strategy that aims at the scope 1
emissions of a city and the efficiency of urban infra systems.
Urban Symbiosis as Innovation Strategy
In the 1980s, a gradual change took place in
analyzing innovation: The thus far prevalent 'techno-science' analysis
of technological change, explaining technological change as being the
result of the unavoidable progress of science, gradually disappeared.
Instead, 'socio technical analyses of technological change emphasized
that the construction of technology was not merely a linear product of
scientific change. Instead, technological change was analyzed as a
militia-faceted process, in which knowledge, social actors and physical
elements could play a role. Various theories differed especially
regarding the importance of social processes versus new knowledge and
technical processes. However, the basic analysis for all these
approaches was aimed at explaining the (un-) successful introduction of
new ideas and new artifacts.
Urban symbiosis can be successfully analyzed using actor network theory [26,27].
However, the voluntaristic character of actor network theory points to a
major problem in urban symbiosis types of innovation: As the infra
systems involved are characterized by a culture of autonomy, there is
hardly any space for the so called 'translator spokesman' to start
building an actor network that comprises two or more infra systems.
Moreover, initiatives emerging from one of the infra systems can easily
be rejected by the other(s) as being motivated by self-interest.
For the success of urban symbiosis, it is not so much
important to explain how a translator-spokesman translates actors in an
actor network and how he keeps them aligned; it is far more important
to understand how alliances across organizational divides, alliances
that serve different actor worlds, could be formed. It therefore does
not only take alignment of actor interests, but also alignment of
institutional interests. For example, institutions might be involved in
competitive processes that prohibit cooperation. Third party involvement
might be a way to bridge those conflicts. [28].
In the remaining part of this paper, I will sketch a
number of urban symbiosis innovations, and will briefly analyze watt
these options require in terms of technological and institutional
change. These will be grouped as:
a. Heat options
b. Biogas generation options
c. And non-energy related symbiosis options
Options for heat recovery
Most of our urban systems generate, or contain heat
as a by- or waste-product. This heat might be recovered for heating
purposes, or to generate other forms of energy. In order to use waste
heat it is often necessary to have a district heating system and/or use
heat pumps that are able to upgrade the heat.
Heat pumps are devices that transport heat opposed to
their natural direction of flow. Their coefficient of performance
(COP), being the ratio of heat energy transported and the electric
energy used by the pump is in general between 3and 4, which implies that
heat pumps are 3 to 4 times as efficient as electric heaters.
Industrial Waste heat
Industrial waste heat might be a huge heat source of
high quality and therefore ideal for feeding a district heating system.
In general, industry will not treat the heat that conventional district
heating systems require (about 90oC) as waste heat. Often, industrial
waste heat is 60-80oC. The solution for district heating might be
twofold:
a. Upgrading the heat by using a heat pump, which will require additional energy
b. A district heating system with a lower working
temperature, which will require quite substantial investments in the
system, but will lead to a higher efficiency.
There are advantages and disadvantages for both parties involved:
A. Advantages
I. A source of cheap heat for the city, a source of additional income for industry.
II. Energy efficiency leading to less overall energy consumption and less CO2 emissions.
III. Less thermal emissions, meaning less disturbance of marine ecosystems.
B. Disadvantages
i. District heating needs heat all the time: no maintenance gaps.
ii. Interdependence: what if future conditions change, heating changes, waste heat availability changes?
iii. Costs might be high if the waste heat is not at close distance.
iv. What if industry becomes more efficient and produces less waste heat?
Especially these dynamic factors ('what if') curb the
freedom of the organizations involved. In fact the symbiosis will
diminish the freedom of operation of each participating organization
which often turns out to be a main barrier. Heat from sewage Figure 1.
Heat from sewage
Much of the heat we use can be re-used. In a shower
for example, heat is only used for about 3 seconds before disposal. The
outflow of shower water can be used to pre-heat the water entering the
heater. In this way, showers take far less energy [29].
However, also after water has been disposed in the
sewers, its heat can be used. Water entering the sewer from a household
is on average about 20 oC. Thereby the sewer could be a source of low
quality heat that might be used for heating using heat pumps. However,
sewer systems that also drain storm water might be colder during high
rainfall and melting snow.
The disadvantage of using the heat from the sewage
might be that the water temperature will be lower when arriving at the
waste water treatment plant. As sewer pipes are dug in rather deep,
their temperature will always be around 11 oC (the constant temperature
of the soil deeper than 1 meter for NW Europe) and so the sewage
temperature will always tend to move towards 11 oC. A lower sewage
temperature might mean that more heat is required for the sewage
treatment process.
Using the heat of the effluent of the wastewater treatment plant does not create such a disadvantage [30].
It might even lower thermal pollution if the effluent is discharged in
open waters. Using the heat of effluent is attractive if there is a
large heat consumer nearby (e.g. a swimming pool or a main line of the
district heating system). For example, in Raalte, the Netherlands, the
effluent of the waste water treatment plant supplies half of heat
required for heating the local swimming pool which saves 57000m3 of
natural gas annually. Security of heat supply might be an issue here:
cities might have more than one waste water treatment plant, which they
might use to switch of a complete plant for maintenance.
Heat from drinking water production
Drinking water wells pump up water at a constant
temperature of about 11 oC. Although the temperature is often lower than
the sewage water (except in periods of lots of winter storm- and
melting water), this might serve as a more constant source of heat for
heat pumps, provided that there are nearby consumers. For drinking water
production, it is attractive to lower the temperature of the water as
lower water temperatures lower the risk of bio films forming in the
drinking water pipes. In Culemborg, the Netherlands, the local water
well of the Vitens water company provides heat for a district heating
system for 200 dwellings [31].
Heat from large electricity transformers
High Voltage Electricity generally enters the city at
a transformer station, where it is transformed into lower voltages.
This might create significant losses, i.e. heat is formed that has to be
disposed of. The normal solution is to cool the transformer by cooling
fins. However, especially if there is a nearby district heating network
or other heat consumer, the heat could be used as an additional heat
source [32].
Heat from roads
Roads are rather good 'black' surfaces, i.e. they
reflect little light. In summertime, they can become about 15oC warmer
than the ambient temperatures. Road surfaces can be used as heat
collectors that can produce hot water. As this hot water is only
available during warm periods, it cannot be used directly for heating
purposes. However, under the right conditions, it might be stored
underground in specific layers of sand for example, to be used during
winter time. The capillaries that collect the heat from the road prevent
that the road is damaged by the high temperatures. The same capillaries
might also be used to warm the road during winter time, preventing
frost damage to the road and contributing to traffic safety [33].
The heat that roads produce in Western Europe is far more than what is
required for de-icing in winter. Domestic heating could use the heat but
only if distances are short. In general there are no residential areas
near motorways and therefore heat from road is more appropriate for
urban roads [34].
Heat and Cold from open water
Many cities have a water infrastructure: canals,
rivers and sea shore. This water might both be used for heat and cold
supply. Especially deep water might be used for this aim. Heat pumps
might use the heat from open water to obtain heat for district heating
in winter and/or to get rid of heat in summer.
In Scheveningen, a part of The Hague, a 2 step system
has been created: water is pumped through a district heating/ cooling
system. The water is heated (and cooled in summer) by sea water. In
winter, an additional heat pump heats the water to 11 oC. By using this
distribution temperature, the pipes do not need insulation. The
inhabitants have a private heat pump to produce heat for their home
system. In summer they can use the system for cooling.
By this use of open water, winter water temperatures
might go down a bit, which is probably in the direction of a more
natural situation. Summer water temperatures might go up somewhat, which
could be a problem especially for rivers and canals.
The city of Drammen, Norway has the largest
sea-water/heat pump heating system. It produces 14MW of hot water,
sufficient for 85% of Drammen’s hot water needs [35].
Biogas
Biogas exists of a mixture of gases. It is produced
by the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter. It can be produced
from almost any organic waste.
From sewage
In modern wastewater treatment facilities, anaerobic
digesters produce biogas, while removing the pathogens, conserving the
nutrients from the sewage and lowering the oxygen demand of the sewage.
The biogas is often used in the wastewater treatment facilities
themselves; often electricity is produced in a CHP and the resulting
heat is used for various processes in these facilities. As the need for
heat is rather limited, it is often argued that the biogas should be
used where there is also a high demand for heat, i.e. a CHP facility for
district heating [27].
From organic waste
Biogas might also be produced from organic waste. In
the past, when waste water treatment took more energy, organic waste was
collected as it could relatively easy be composted and returned to
agriculture. The mineral cycle was closed in this way. In some cases,
large amounts of organic wastes were converted to bio fuel by
hydrogenation, pyrolysis, gasification, or bioconversion [36]. A pioneer of biogas production was the city of Linkoping that had to deal with large amounts of waste from slaughterhouses [37].
Nowadays, as wastewater treatment plants become net producers of
energy, it could be advantageous to combine organic waste with sewage
and treat it in the waste water treatment facilities. This will create
more biogas and diminish the costs and energy consumption of domestic
waste collection schemes [38].
With the change in efficiency of waste water
treatment plants and their biogas production, a rule has often been
reversed: It used to be forbidden to add organic waste to the sewage. In
some places it is now even encouraged to use macerators (kitchen waste
disposers) to grind organic waste and dispose of it in the sewers [27]. Of course, as always, chemicals that affect the anaerobic digestion process are not to be disposed of in this way.
Non energy examples of urban symbiosis
Insect protein production from food waste
Proteins are an essential ingredient of human food:
meat, fish, dairy, eggs, and various vegetable sources like peas and
beans. When people get richer, their animal based protein consumption
rises even more. This has large environmental effects. Beef and veal
produced in Western Europe takes large amounts of soy fodder that is
often imported from Brazil, where rainforests are cleared to grow soy
beans. Animals are 'rather inefficient' in producing meat proteins and
so almost 95% of the vegetable proteins are lost in this process.
There are various better alternatives:
a. Soy fodder could be the base for attractive food products
b. More effective forms of protein production could be promoted (chicken, fish)
c. New forms of proteins could be developed.
Edible insects might be interesting to breed in urban
areas. They might be fed on food waste. Especially if cities have
separate food waste collection systems (either by separate collection
bins or by carburetors/macerators/kitchen waste disposers attached to a
separate sewer pipes) this might be an interesting option for smaller
scale insect production. Some problems:
a. Although insects are eaten in large parts of the
world, the richest part of the world seems to have developed a taboo on
insect consumption. Can this taboo be broken or will this taboo act as a
cultural frame for developing nations?
b. Although insects might be rather efficient
producers of protein, breeding them might require higher temperatures
(e.g. mealworms) that require heating energy...
c. There might be various biological risks: contamination of the food waste, contagious diseases, etc.
The disadvantages of insect breeding might easily reinforce cultural resistance.
Separate collection of Urine
Waste water can be a source of minerals: Struvite is a
phosphate containing mineral that can be recovered and be used as
fertilizer. Struvite might form spontaneously in waste water clearing
facilities and pipes. In this way it is often a nuisance as it clogs
pipes, etc. Separate urine collection might lead to less energy
consumption of waste water treatment and a higher recovery of minerals.
The urine might be collected from urinals and from
special toilets in which urine is kept apart from the faeces. Special
toilets might have a social acceptance problem.
Other products might be obtained from wastewater e.g. alginate polymer. For an overview: [39]
These changes are not so much a symbiosis between urban systems as well
as a systemic change within the wastewater system that requires changes
in behaviour of citizen, and perhaps changes in markets that might use
these products.
Electricity grid stabilisation by smart communication
Electricity demand and supply can be better managed
in order to avoid shortages in electricity that have to be filled at
high costs. Peak demand can be lowered. As peak demand defines the
electricity production capacity, investments can be reduced, especially
investments that are only used to deal with exceptional peaks. It also
leads to higher electricity prices at moments that there is plenty
electricity (due to good winds/sunshine), as electricity demand will be
shifted to these moments.
a. 'Smart grids' allow users to postpone electricity
consumption until prices are low, while it allows producers to produce
when prices are high. Various industrial and domestic electric
appliances are able to postpone consumption:
b. Washing machines can be programmed to wash laundry
within a larger time frame. However, washing at night creates noise.
Dish washers, can be programmed to wash dishes within a larger time
frame.
c. Cold Storage and Freezers, operating temperatures
of storage might vary a bit to allow for avoidance of peak electricity
consumption.
d. (Micro) CHP units could be equipped with small heat storage to provide them some flexibility in electricity supply.
e. Smart grids might potentially safe billions of Euros in electricity production and transport. [40]
f. In the future, electric vehicles might act as
stabilizers of the electricity grid, by smart management of charging.
This is the so-called Virtual Power plant. It will create enormous
streams of data, to administer electricity consumption and grid
stabilization efforts [41].
Roads as infrastructure corridors
Roads divide areas and create various nuisances.
Shielding is often required to prevent serious health effects created by
noise, particulate matter and traffic accidents involving dangerous
substances. Potentially the nuisances can be minimized by combining the
road trajectory with other infrastructures. Roads and railroads are
frequently combined, but also various other infrastructures might use
the corridor, provided that they do not have negative interaction, or
their combination creates additional risks. Shielding measures (trees
for reducing particulate matter and sound walls to reduce noise might
also be selected to increasing biomass production and for being a
carrier of PV cells. Roadside grass might be used to generate bio fuel
(as it is often problematic to use it as animal feed [42].
Towards an urban metabolic system
Urban symbiosis: a physical, economic and political challenge
There are an overwhelming number of options for urban
symbiosis. However, one might wonder why so few of them are actually
applied. Why is it so difficult to realize urban symbiosis projects that
are often quite interesting both from an economic and an environmental
point of view. The main reason is that these projects are hard to
define:
a. Complexity: a project does not only need to be
good (profitable, environmentally sound,) in total; it also needs to be
good for each separate partner.
b. More enemies: Instead of defending a project in one organization, the product champion needs to defend it in two.
c. Monopolistic relations: In free markets, unwilling
partners might just be exchanged. That is in urban symbiosis often
impossible. Partners know that and might start an unproductive
bargaining game.
d. Urban symbiosis projects are often no core business for all the involved partners.
Urban Symbiosis: mere incremental change and lots of lock in?
Symbiosis as a strategy for environmental improvement
has sometimes been called an incremental change strategy that does not
contribute to the changes that are required. It thereby contributes to
further lock in, creating actually a barrier for sustainability
transitions.
Actually, the integration of technical system proves
not to be limited to incremental change. The development of symbiosis
between systems does not create a main barrier to transitions. On the
contrary, in fact the integration of technical systems might contribute
to, or even trigger transitions [46].
In conclusion, it is fair to say that there are many
options for urban symbiosis. It is fair to say that these options might
reduce resource consumption and emissions by tens of percent. The main
barrier is in the complexity of managing all the interests involved [31].
For more open access journals please visit: Juniper publishers
For more articles please click on: Civil Engineering Research Journal
Comments
Post a Comment